|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CosmosHub | 787 | Formally request full financial transparency from the Interchain Foundation | Link | Yes | This is an non-binding unnecessary proposal and we would rather wish it does not exist. However, since it exists, we support it in spirit. |
| CosmosHub | 717 | Make Cosmos Hub the Sponsor of Game of NFTs Phase 2 Hackathon | Link | Yes | LFG |
| CosmosHub | 704 | ARBITRUM Airdrop | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
| CosmosHub | 703 | Atom Airdrop 🪂 | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
| CosmosHub | 687 | Replicated Security Third Party Audit | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| CosmosHub | 647 | ATOM Airdrop for COSMOS stakers ⚛️ | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
| CosmosHub | 646 | ATOM Airdrop for COSMOS stakers | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
| CosmosHub | 640 | ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
| CosmosHub | 202 | Interchain Info Funding | Link | No | The creation of an interchain information/resource hub is a great idea, but the team behind this proposal is not a good fit to execute on this vision. We have reviewed the current product prototype. It does not give us confidence in terms of design and functionality. Granted, you can argue that the project needs to be funded before they can be fully assessed. However, we argue the opposite. It is the proposer's responsibility to establish a track record to convince voters that they have the capabilities to execute on a vision laid out in a governance proposal. We think that Timmy and Interchain Info do not have the product-founder fit and hope he can explore alternative routes to contribute to the interchain (and ask for funding accordingly). |
| CosmosHub | 187 | v9-Lambda | Link | Yes | This upgrade will enable Replicated Security! |