|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CosmosHub | 717 | Make Cosmos Hub the Sponsor of Game of NFTs Phase 2 Hackathon | Link | Yes | LFG |
| CosmosHub | 704 | ARBITRUM Airdrop | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
| CosmosHub | 703 | Atom Airdrop 🪂 | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
| CosmosHub | 687 | Replicated Security Third Party Audit | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| CosmosHub | 647 | ATOM Airdrop for COSMOS stakers ⚛️ | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
| CosmosHub | 646 | ATOM Airdrop for COSMOS stakers | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
| CosmosHub | 640 | ATOM Airdrop ⚛️ | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
| CosmosHub | 202 | Interchain Info Funding | Link | No | The creation of an interchain information/resource hub is a great idea, but the team behind this proposal is not a good fit to execute on this vision. We have reviewed the current product prototype. It does not give us confidence in terms of design and functionality. Granted, you can argue that the project needs to be funded before they can be fully assessed. However, we argue the opposite. It is the proposer's responsibility to establish a track record to convince voters that they have the capabilities to execute on a vision laid out in a governance proposal. We think that Timmy and Interchain Info do not have the product-founder fit and hope he can explore alternative routes to contribute to the interchain (and ask for funding accordingly). |
| CosmosHub | 187 | v9-Lambda | Link | Yes | This upgrade will enable Replicated Security! |
| CosmosHub | 155 | Spacebox - Tool for chain Indexation and Storage in the Cosmos Hub | Link | No | Coming from the Polkadot world, we are painfully aware that grant-based funding does not work because product is often not sustained once the grant money runs out. We will be happy to consider a retro-funding once if the product has a working prototype. |