|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evmos | 116 | Disable conversion for previously registered EEUR | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Evmos | 115 | DoraHacks Hackathon Proposal with Evmos | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Evmos | 114 | Register ERC20 for yEVMOS: Liquid Staking Token | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Evmos | 113 | [ECP-2A] Formalizing and Funding the Governance Council Workstream (Rev. 2) | Link | No | While we agree with the foundational layer established on Prop 83, we believe it is too early for Evmos chain to bureaucratize the DAO functions. The project is still in its early days and many processes are still fluid. We do not think it is wise to enact such workstream at this stage. |
| Evmos | 112 | Evmos Mainnet v11.0.0 Upgrade | Link | Yes | This upgrade contains will add ICA host functionality add distribution logic for incentivized testnet rewards. |
| Evmos | 111 | Evmos x Covalent Hackathon Participant Rewards Re-Adjustment | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Evmos | 110 | Encode Club's Evmos Grant Proposal | Link | Yes | This is a strong proposal. Evmos needs a grant proposal to support the growing developer ecosystem while freeing up the mental load required to evaluate funding proposals among the general token holders. Without an effective grant program, an endless stream o funding proposals will either cause the public voting fatigue, or devolve into a popularity contest among funding proposers, or both. None of the outcomes are ideal. We have known Encode Club since our early days as a validator on Polkadot/Kusama. They are professional and eager to support the ecosystem development in the blockchain space. |
| Evmos | 109 | New Evmos Liquidity Incentive and SpaceFi Whole Launching | Link | No | We applaud that SpaceFi team has been building on Evmos since Day 1 and has continued to ship products. However, we think that Evmos should focus on flagship DeFi projects with limited resources. So far, the team and the community are working to bring UniSwap to Evmos, which we wholeheartedly support. Teams like SpaceFi should continue to compete with product innovations, but we will vote "No" on this proposal to preserve the resources for big battles. |
| Evmos | 107 | Cancellation of Prop 45, Clarification of Laurel Project Role | Link | Yes | We are so glad that this Laurel Project madness is almost over. Hehehe. |
| Evmos | 106 | Consensus Test | Link | No With Veto | SPAM! |