|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evmos | 92 | Funding Request - MetaTank | Link | No | We vote "No" for three reasons. 1. The product seems trivial and gimmicky even if its final vision is realized. 2. The team does not have a solid track record of building product with wide user adoption. 3. The team has not deep connections with Evmos community and its engagement will start with the proposal and will probably end if the proposal fails. Do not get us wrong: We want to support teams committed to web3 and Evmos. However, we have no tolerance in treasury funding shoppers. If the team is indeed serious, we want to see the team start building something for the community to prove themselves. We will be happy to do a retro funding if it has a product that users want. |
| Evmos | 91 | Register ERC20 for COMPOSITE (CMST): Stablecoin of Harbor Protocol | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Evmos | 89 | Register ERC20 for COMDEX (CMDX) | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Evmos | 88 | Common Sense Setting: No Payment For Unsolicited Services | Link | No | In general, we are in favor of putting up more guardrails against opportunistic grant proposal shoppers. However, the proposer of this proposal has taken an absolutist approach and been unreasonably hostile towards dissenters in the Discord chat. As a result, the content of the proposal is not fully flushed out, and it contains language like “common sense” and “moral independence” that essentially put dissenters in a morally inferior position. We think the author can amend the language and request feedback from the community in a new discussion. |