|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juno | 124 | Fair and Equitable Distribution of Remaining Funds | Link | No | DEXs on Juno faces an existential question: Do the builders truly believe that they can beat app-chain DEX like Osmosis? If not, then they will just be an arbitrage hunting ground until the incentives run out. The strategic alternative is to pursue a "regional" DEX strategy. It can provide liquidity between CW tokens and the native JUNO tokens to support projects on the ecosystem. This way, we do not directly compete with app-chain DEXs, who will likely never bother to list these "minor" tokens. We believe in this strategy. Therefore, incentives for JUNO/ATOM, JUNO/USDC, and JUNO/OSMO make no strategic sense. |
| Juno | 93 | Community Spend Proposal for AmigoSound Project | Link | No | The Juno Growth Fund reviewed this project and determined not to provide funding at this time after reviewing the proposed funding request. We concur with the decision. |
| Juno | 89 | Cosmos Option Vaults by CzarDAO | Link | Yes | It is a well-thought plan and well-written proposal. The team has a working product and will open-source the code in accordance with Prop 64. The main criticism is that the team is small and might not be able to deliver. We think otherwise. A small team size is a plus, not a minus, in crypto. We believe that the team will be able to deliver based on the current working product. LFG! |
| Juno | 87 | Hack Juno Turkey | Link | Yes | This proposal seems like a sincere effort to spread the awareness of Juno and CosmWasm in Turkey and the request amount is very reasonable. |
| Juno | 85 | CORRECTED: Make JUNO Carbon Neutral by Purchasing Eco-Credits | Link | No | While we support reducing carbon footprint as a climate-friendly validator, we fundamentally believe that it is wasteful of the collective effort to go chain-by-chain on an annual basis to solicit carbon credit. There must be a better way. |
| Juno | 83 | Make JUNO Carbon Neutral by Purchasing Eco-Credits | Link | No | While we support reducing carbon footprint as a climate-friendly validator, we fundamentally believe that it is wasteful of the collective effort to go chain-by-chain on an annual basis to solicit carbon credit. There must be a better way. |
| Juno | 79 | Revive Terra classic IBC Client | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Juno | 77 | Launch Sauce SubDAO | Link | Yes | We vote "Yes", but we want to take this opportunity to discuss Juno's current identity crisis using this core idea of this Prop. Juno's initial appeal is that it was the first wasm-enabled permissionless chain. However, the advantage did not last long, as wasm-enabled chains are table stakes nowadays. So what should be Juno's next great act? One way is to keep it a serious chain to make products that users and other chains want. The alternative is to make it an experimental chain that fights the great meme battles for the web3 ideal. Some say that we can do both, but we say that we have to make a conscious choice as the strategic north star. This Prop hints on the second route. Nothing wrong with this, if that's what the community wants. |
| Juno | 72 | Community consent Cosmos Pay supporting JUNO | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Juno | 68 | Enable Global Fees on Juno | Link | Yes | LFG |