Governance Participation

Network
Proposal ID
Proposal
Explorer Link
Vote
Reason
Juno 341 Migrate Control For Wynd Juno Link Yes LFG!
Juno 340 Juno Upgrade: Mandrake Patch (v21) Link Yes LFG!
Juno 339 Development Election: Kopeboy Link Abstain 🫡
Juno 338 Development Election: André Link Abstain 🫡
Juno 337 Development Election: Ray Raspberry Link Abstain 🫡
Juno 336 Operations Election: Ninjaxan Link Abstain 🫡
Juno 335 Operations Election: Lil D Link Abstain 🫡
Juno 333 Juno Upgrade: Rhea (v19) Link Yes LFG!
Juno 332 Reactivate expired IBC client for Teritori Link Yes LFG!
Juno 331 Shift focus from feature upgrades to finishing dApps and dev onboarding Link No The proposal has vaguely defined terms. What exactly are features? What are dApps? The proposal would have more credibility if it comes from a developer who works on Juno himself/herself. As it stands now, we believe such proposals do more harm than good for Juno.