|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kava | 137 | Add Kava Origin to Kava Infrastructure and Security Rewards | Link | No | We disagree with Prop 135 to establish Kara Origin and we disagree with this proposal. The objection is not about the merit of the proposal itself; rather it is about the lack of transparency regarding the rationale behind Kava Origin. |
| Kava | 136 | Addition of Multichain USDC,wBTC,USDT to Kava Lend | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Kava | 135 | Establish Kava Origin foundation | Link | No With Veto | This is the craziest Kava proposal we have ever see. No prior discussion, no engagement with the community, and no context on why this is needed. No with veto! |
| Kava | 134 | Kava Rise payouts for March 2023 | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Kava | 133 | Update stability committee permissions to include USDC Kava Lend market | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Kava | 132 | Deposit Funds into Kava Lend | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Kava | 131 | Adds Axlear USDC (erc20/axelar/usdc) to Kava Lend and updates incentives allocation to include axlUSDC incentives in Kava Lend. | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Kava | 130 | Addition of ETH price feed | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Kava | 129 | Kava Rise payouts for February 2023 | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Kava | 128 | Support Decentralization and Security on the Kava Network | Link | No | We support 5% minimum commission for validators on Kava, but we do not agree with the reasoning in the proposal. 5% minimum commission has nothing to do with decentralization. In fact, it probably will hurt decentralization in the long run as a low commission rate is how a new validator can bootstrap itself into the active set. With 5% minimum commission, the active set will become more static in the long run. That said, we do support 5% minimum commission, for the simple reason that it allows validators to have enough profit to buy/rent decent hardware to secure the network. |