|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osmosis | 434 | Add FTM to the list of Major category assets | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Osmosis | 433 | Signalling Proposal for OSMO/FTM incentivised pool | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Osmosis | 431 | Signaling Proposal - Define New Stable Asset: IST and incentivize stable swap pool DAI / CMST / IST with OSMO rewards | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Osmosis | 430 | Signaling Proposal for IST/OSMO External Incentive Match | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Osmosis | 429 | Remove Exit Fee option from pools | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Osmosis | 428 | Regular Incentive adjustment for 2023-02-13 | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Osmosis | 427 | Signalling Proposal for Initial IBC Rate Limits | Link | Yes | Rate-limiting for the win! |
| Osmosis | 426 | BUSD bootstrapping liquidity incentives | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Osmosis | 425 | Signalling Proposal for OSMO/BUSD (#899) incentivised pool | Link | Yes | LFG |
| Osmosis | 424 | Signaling Proposal for ATOM/stkATOM Stableswap Pool External Incentive Match | Link | No | The ATOM/stkATOM pool already has $1.7M liquidity. We believe that's enough depth of liquidity for a stable token swap. Plus, pStake already offers external incentive, so the LP providers are rewarded kindly already. Osmosis incentives are typically used to bootstrap liquidity, and we think it is unnecessary in this case. |